Posted on August 4, 2008 in Bar Exams
The entire phbar community would like to express its gratitude to Joan for sharing her time and effort in giving a lecture during the 2nd Gathering of the phbar community. Joan placed No. 1 during the 2005 Bar Exams. Here’s a summary of the lecture:
First: Make an honest assessment of the subjects you are good at, and the subjects you feel you have an inadequate foundation on. Adjust the number of days devoted to each subject accordingly.
Second: Compact reviewers might not necessarily help, especially for those subjects in which you are weak at, and the morning subjects.
Third: Choose the review classes you want to attend. (I enrolled at the law center but didn’t attend most of the lectures).
Fourth: Avoid unnecessary comparison to the pace of others. We all have our own rhythm according to the laws of inertia.
Fifth: Perfect your handwriting and grammar.
Sixth: Write things down. I had so many post-its in my codals, especially for Civ and Rem. It was like a mini-book where all the important doctrines were jotted down.
Seventh: No need to memorize laws. If you must memorize, memorize only the key words of important doctrines. Please, don’t memorize case titles and SCRA citations. Don’t clog your brain with useless clutter. Understanding is key.
Eighth: For the bar, short answers don’t necessarily work. The answer must be firm yet exhaustive. I did not cite cases nor specific provisions, but just went straight to the answers.
Ninth: Updates on latest jurisprudence are indispensable. Request that the updates come with short facts, because bar questions are often facts-based.
Tenth: Always make time for gimmicks and relaxation to keep you sane during the review.
The full presentation is attached at the bottom of the post at phBar.org.
Loading ...
hi atty.joan,
hindi talaga ako makapsok.lagi my confirmation code is wrong daw.kinokpya ko naman lahat.meron bang manualy na lang o cyberspace lang to na group
yours truly,
jerry
Jers, it’s easy to register at phbar.org — just click here and follow the instructions. There’s a security code that you have to fill up (feature added due to the increasing volume of spam registrations). The code is case-sensitive, which means you should use capital-small letters as they appear. The flood control kicks in after a number of erroneous tries…so you have to wait again for a few minutes. Good luck.
atty fred,
naka register din.thank you
jerry
sir fred
thank you
jerrs
atty joan
thanks din looking forward sa phbar family
LEGALADVANTAGE BAR Pre-week 2008 on-going at
Gapuz Review Center, 5/F SM City Manila.
Registration at Php1,850/week (2 subjects)
or Php1,000/subject
For details and reservation please contact Ryan at (02) 894 0921 or 09176689172 or visit this link: http://www.legaladvantage.com.ph/register/register.php?itemid=7
Joc Joc a big joke
The Fourth Estate, or tri-media, even has to misbehave upon Joc Joc’s arrival at the NAIA such that a stricter policy has to be issued to serve public notice that because of such disturbing scuffle, security for media will be at its worst come another similar event. Offhand, shouldn’t NAIA to be blamed for trying to apparently hide Joc Joc from public view and for that matter, within arm’s length from media that already stayed vigil one day ahead?
Compared however to how institutions misbehave as well, NAIA dwarfs in comparison. Senate engages in a tug of war with the Department of Justice as to who should issue arrest order and to take custody of Joc Joc. Ironically, it is St. Lukes that stole the thunder with the possibility that Joc Joc stays in the hospital for as long as either the patient or the doctor so desires. This has been truly anti-climactic to the false excitement stirred.
For another, Senate is trying to pull the rope again – at least, a second time around – from the Ombudsman that has already the jurisdiction over the case when the Senate already transmitted its report. Senator Angara thinks that the SC should step into the case believing that even a single SC justice can in fact issue a temporary restraining order.
Bottomline, the question is on which legal radar screen must we find Joc Joc? Is Senate the proper forum or is it more likely the Ombudsman? Should DOJ still join the fray like some private law firm on a generous retainer fee? Will the Supreme Court step into the picture in some impromptu decision as to whether the case ought to be reopened and therefore be reinvestigated by the Senate? Should the case be initiated now at the Ombudsman as the proper forum after Senate’s own report has made conclusive its findings on Joc Joc’s guilt on the fertilizer scam? What is the sense of the SC on the matter?
There seems to be of a legal problem on how things could really begin but suffice it to say that St. Lukes has become an asylum of sort. While in the hospital to buy time, Joc Joc should be about ready to dispose self whoever takes him next and where. Senate has already prepared the ‘guest room’ for Joc Joc complete with decent amenities – free board and lodging, at taxpayers’ expense. Depending on which institution takes higher precedence, the Sergeant-At-Arms of the Senate or the NBI of the justice department or the agents of the Ombudsman – whoever – could in fact arrest Joc Joc is no longer of any moment to the viewing universe.
We are into a new kind of legal rigmarole. Is there anything else that the Senate should feast on in the case of Joc Joc? What stones, if any, were left unturned, when Senate already officially and with finality issued its committee report thereby endorsing to the Ombudsman appropriate legal action on Joc Joc? It can effectively mean that the earlier report is set aside if that were at all possible to pave the way for a new and final report after Joc Joc could have been made to appear before the Senate investigation committee and answer all questions – live on TV. And again, if viciously, Senate will transmit report to the Ombudsman that should now initiate proper legal proceedings. St. Lukes, at anytime of the investigation period, can provide convenient alibi for the inability of Joc Joc to further testify. What do we have next?
Generally speaking, there seems to be nothing more to know than has already been revealed or made public by way of all sorts of news reports and that of the Senate. It should be Joc Joc who should run after our institutions if he were bent to redeem himself, if he can, from the seeming persecution he experienced – in and out of the country. He should present himself voluntarily and with conviction in every public forum available to clear his name, if it were possible at all under the circumstances and weight of evidence offered by the Senate committee or by COA’s own audit report.
That Villar appears to be pressing the ball to the disgust of Ping Lacson by announcing he will yet to call a caucus and yet did not yet call one. That the Ombudsman is yet to be in any indicative mood to take jurisdiction over the case and to set a self-imposed deadline to make its disposition over the case complete after some reasonable time is equally disturbing. The House of Representatives might also want a piece of the cake however unthinkingly.
For want of Joc Joc, nothing will be known. There are legal experts who think Joc Joc can opt to speak or not speak. Not few think, the matter has yet to be decided as to who should take jurisdiction and until this can be drawn, Joc Joc is a freeman. By the time one legal loop has been untangled, a new Gordian knot ought to be untangled as to whether Joc Joc, now not an official of the government, can be compelled by any official government body or persona to appear than disappear. Things have become more complicated than simple and that gave Joc Joc a lot of redemption value. Is this part of a higher order of things? Well, maybe yes.
Whether Joc Joc is malingering to be suffering from any kind of illness to evade arrest or further legal action against him is deemed beside the point. Senate, DOJ, Ombudsman, House of Representatives, SC – in running after Joc Joc – are all caught in a legal stampede and where any of these institutions chokes to its death, figuratively speaking, serves as an indication of our damaged psyche. In the end, even with Joc Joc telling us all what he knows, the point is that the beneficiaries have already run away with the loot and are in fact, Scot-free and one poor Joc Joc just provides the immunity blanket for all the thieves in a grand thievery. Where will all this lead us to? Nowhere, just nowhere and Joc Joc will bring us no comfort even if he be found guilty. Pray tell, the present agriculture secretary will not be another Joc Joc in our troubled midst.
Nor would we rather have Joc Joc get to tell all he knows whoever gets hurt and transformed himself as another Jun Lozada or another young Jose de Venecia. If ever, it will only add up to the long list of political wannabes come 2010 who make their fleeting overnight celebrity status a jumping board for political success. Enough, just enough – Jun Lozada, whistle-blower Joey de V – will not make it out of nothing than false publicity gimmick. Any class of nuns in our religious world should stop tinkering with the idea of coddling Joc Joc as they have coddled Jun Lozada for clear political ends. This form of madness must come to an end. Not one of these guys could be classed as the underdog – they are all part of the bourgeoisie – shame on them.
PRIMER C. PAGUNURAN
(For comments, email nielsky_2003@yahoo.com)
im having problems with the confirmation code as well…ive tried it when i was in cagayan de oro now i cant still get it to work…pls help? Can anyone email it to me at liza_archangel@yahoo.com ??? pls? pls? Pls?
May God bless you always for taking the time to help me. Liza
[...] Atty. At Work. 0.000000 [...]