<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AttyAtWork.com &#187; Legal Procedure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://attyatwork.com/category/legal-procedure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://attyatwork.com</link>
	<description>Legal thoughts and beyond. The personal blog of Atty. Fred Pamaos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Live Webcaset or Video Streaming of the Maguindanao Massacre cases</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/live-webcaset-or-video-streaming-of-the-maguindanao-massacre-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/live-webcaset-or-video-streaming-of-the-maguindanao-massacre-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maguindanao Massacre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attyatwork.com/?p=2073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a first for the Philippines, the Supreme Court today provided a live webcast or video streaming in its website (sc.judiciary.gov.ph) of a pending case. The live coverage is for the &#8220;Maguindanao Massacre cases&#8220;. The SC earlier issued the guidelines applicable only (pro hac vice) to the live broadcasting by radio and television of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/live-webcaset-or-video-streaming-of-the-maguindanao-massacre-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MCLE Compliance: Implementation of Bar Matter 1922 extended to 1 January 2009</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/mcle-compliance-implementation-of-bar-matter-1922-extended-to-1-january-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/mcle-compliance-implementation-of-bar-matter-1922-extended-to-1-january-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attyatwork.com/?p=741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court earlier issued Bar Matter No. 1922, requiring all lawyers to indicate the number and date of issue of their MCLE Certificate of Compliance, and if they could not do so by 25, August 2008, it will result to the dismissal of the case and the expunction of the pleadings from the records. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/mcle-compliance-implementation-of-bar-matter-1922-extended-to-1-january-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JURIS Project: Supreme Court promotes mediation and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/juris-project-supreme-court-promotes-mediation-and-alternative-dispute-resolution-mechanisms/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/juris-project-supreme-court-promotes-mediation-and-alternative-dispute-resolution-mechanisms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attyatwork.com/juris-project-supreme-court-promotes-mediation-and-alternative-dispute-resolution-mechanisms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Philippine judiciary continues to battle with hundreds of thousands of cases pending before it, the Supreme Court of the Philippines through the Justice Reform Initiatives Support (JURIS) Project promotes the use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms to help de-clog the court dockets.Latest figures show that while there are 702,147 pending cases in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/juris-project-supreme-court-promotes-mediation-and-alternative-dispute-resolution-mechanisms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salient Points of the Amendments to Rules 41, 45, 58 and 65 of the Rules of Court</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/salient-points-amendments-rules-41-45-58-65-rules-of-court/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/salient-points-amendments-rules-41-45-58-65-rules-of-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attyatwork.com/salient-points-amendments-rules-41-45-58-65-rules-of-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court recently approved certain amendments to the Rules of Court. On 4 December 2007, the SC issued A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC, approving the proposed amendments to Rules 41, 45, 58 and 65 of the Rules of Court. The Resolution took effect on 27 December 2007, following its publication in a newspaper of general circulation. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/salient-points-amendments-rules-41-45-58-65-rules-of-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC issues Guidelines for Imposition of Libel Penalties</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/sc-issues-guidelines-for-omposition-of-libel-penalties/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/sc-issues-guidelines-for-omposition-of-libel-penalties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attyatwork.com/sc-issues-guidelines-for-omposition-of-libel-penalties/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court has just issued Administrative Circular No. 08-2008, providing for Guidelines in the Observance of a Rule of Preference in the Imposition of Penalties in Libel Cases. Trial courts may, in its discretion and based on the peculiar circumstances of each case, impose only a fine, instead of imprisonment. In all probability, critics [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/sc-issues-guidelines-for-omposition-of-libel-penalties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Venue of Petitions for Annulment or Declaration of Nullity</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/venue-for-petitions-for-annulment-or-declaration-of-nullity/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/venue-for-petitions-for-annulment-or-declaration-of-nullity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annulment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attyatwork.com/venue-for-petitions-for-annulment-or-declaration-of-nullity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s something that should keep everyone busy over the long weekend. One of the recurring issues in this forum, perhaps primarily because of the apparent increase in interest of Overseas Filipino Workers (OFW) in annulment, is the proper venue of petitions for annulment or declaration of nullity. To address this issue, let&#8217;s consider the following [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/venue-for-petitions-for-annulment-or-declaration-of-nullity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pardon for Erap? What say you?</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/pardon-for-erap-what-say-you/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/pardon-for-erap-what-say-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attyatwork.com/pardon-for-erap-what-say-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a controversy on the proposal to pardon former President Joseph Estrada. Those in favor of the grant of Presidential pardon argue that Erap has suffered enough, that he is already 70 years old and that, in any event, PGMA has absolute discretion to pardon anyone she chooses. Those who oppose the pardon, on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/pardon-for-erap-what-say-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rule on DNA Evidence</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/rule-on-dna-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/rule-on-dna-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attyatwork.com/rule-on-dna-evidence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This month, the Supreme Court issued the Rule on DNA Evidence, through A.M. No. 06-11-5-SC, 2 October 2007. The full text of the Rule on DNA Evidence is at the Philippine e-Legal Forum. The use of DNA in cases gained popularity in recent years. In 2005, the Supreme Court required certain trial court judges to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/rule-on-dna-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Writ of Amparo: Supreme Court approves Rules</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/write-of-amparo-supreme-court-approves-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/write-of-amparo-supreme-court-approves-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attyatwork.com/write-of-amparo-supreme-court-approves-rules/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court already approved the Rule on the Writ of Amparo (A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC), which is a remedy available to any person whose right to life, liberty, and security has been violated or is threatened with violation by an unlawful act or omission of a public official or employee, or of a private individual [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/write-of-amparo-supreme-court-approves-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator Antonio Trillanes: Should he be allowed to post bail</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/senator-antonio-trillanes-should-he-be-allowed-to-post-bail/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/senator-antonio-trillanes-should-he-be-allowed-to-post-bail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attyatwork.com/senator-antonio-trillanes-should-he-be-allowed-to-post-bail/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have a poll (see upper right sidebar) on people&#8217;s opinion on the application for bail of Senator Antonio Trillanes. You may vote only once. Someone suggested to open the discussion because, as you can see from the poll, there&#8217;s no portion where you can explain your vote or post a comment. You may do [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/senator-antonio-trillanes-should-he-be-allowed-to-post-bail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

