<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AttyAtWork &#187; Legal Procedure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://attyatwork.com/category/legal-procedure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://attyatwork.com</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Atty. Fred Pamaos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 11:27:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Impeachment: Should Chief Justice Renato Corona Testify in his Defense?</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/the-impeachment-should-chief-justice-renato-corona-testify-in-his-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/the-impeachment-should-chief-justice-renato-corona-testify-in-his-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renato Corona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attyatwork.com/?p=2308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, 22 March 2012, the defense presented its last witness (former Manila Mayor Lito Atienza) before the Senate, acting as an impeachment court, takes a break. Even before the trial resumes in May, there&#8217;s a discussion on whether Chief Justice &#8230; <a href="http://attyatwork.com/the-impeachment-should-chief-justice-renato-corona-testify-in-his-defense/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/the-impeachment-should-chief-justice-renato-corona-testify-in-his-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Live Webcaset or Video Streaming of the Maguindanao Massacre cases</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/live-webcaset-or-video-streaming-of-the-maguindanao-massacre-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/live-webcaset-or-video-streaming-of-the-maguindanao-massacre-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maguindanao Massacre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attyatwork.com/?p=2073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a first for the Philippines, the Supreme Court today provided a live webcast or video streaming in its website (sc.judiciary.gov.ph) of a pending case. The live coverage is for the &#8220;Maguindanao Massacre cases&#8220;. The SC earlier issued the guidelines &#8230; <a href="http://attyatwork.com/live-webcaset-or-video-streaming-of-the-maguindanao-massacre-cases/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/live-webcaset-or-video-streaming-of-the-maguindanao-massacre-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MCLE Compliance: Implementation of Bar Matter 1922 extended to 1 January 2009</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/mcle-compliance-implementation-of-bar-matter-1922-extended-to-1-january-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/mcle-compliance-implementation-of-bar-matter-1922-extended-to-1-january-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attyatwork.com/?p=741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court earlier issued Bar Matter No. 1922, requiring all lawyers to indicate the number and date of issue of their MCLE Certificate of Compliance, and if they could not do so by 25, August 2008, it will result &#8230; <a href="http://attyatwork.com/mcle-compliance-implementation-of-bar-matter-1922-extended-to-1-january-2009/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/mcle-compliance-implementation-of-bar-matter-1922-extended-to-1-january-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JURIS Project: Supreme Court promotes mediation and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/juris-project-supreme-court-promotes-mediation-and-alternative-dispute-resolution-mechanisms/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/juris-project-supreme-court-promotes-mediation-and-alternative-dispute-resolution-mechanisms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attyatwork.com/juris-project-supreme-court-promotes-mediation-and-alternative-dispute-resolution-mechanisms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Philippine judiciary continues to battle with hundreds of thousands of cases pending before it, the Supreme Court of the Philippines through the Justice Reform Initiatives Support (JURIS) Project promotes the use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms to &#8230; <a href="http://attyatwork.com/juris-project-supreme-court-promotes-mediation-and-alternative-dispute-resolution-mechanisms/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/juris-project-supreme-court-promotes-mediation-and-alternative-dispute-resolution-mechanisms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salient Points of the Amendments to Rules 41, 45, 58 and 65 of the Rules of Court</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/salient-points-amendments-rules-41-45-58-65-rules-of-court/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/salient-points-amendments-rules-41-45-58-65-rules-of-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attyatwork.com/salient-points-amendments-rules-41-45-58-65-rules-of-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court recently approved certain amendments to the Rules of Court. On 4 December 2007, the SC issued A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC, approving the proposed amendments to Rules 41, 45, 58 and 65 of the Rules of Court. The Resolution &#8230; <a href="http://attyatwork.com/salient-points-amendments-rules-41-45-58-65-rules-of-court/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/salient-points-amendments-rules-41-45-58-65-rules-of-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC issues Guidelines for Imposition of Libel Penalties</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/sc-issues-guidelines-for-omposition-of-libel-penalties/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/sc-issues-guidelines-for-omposition-of-libel-penalties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attyatwork.com/sc-issues-guidelines-for-omposition-of-libel-penalties/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court has just issued Administrative Circular No. 08-2008, providing for Guidelines in the Observance of a Rule of Preference in the Imposition of Penalties in Libel Cases. Trial courts may, in its discretion and based on the peculiar &#8230; <a href="http://attyatwork.com/sc-issues-guidelines-for-omposition-of-libel-penalties/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/sc-issues-guidelines-for-omposition-of-libel-penalties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Venue of Petitions for Annulment or Declaration of Nullity</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/venue-for-petitions-for-annulment-or-declaration-of-nullity/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/venue-for-petitions-for-annulment-or-declaration-of-nullity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annulment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attyatwork.com/venue-for-petitions-for-annulment-or-declaration-of-nullity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s something that should keep everyone busy over the long weekend. One of the recurring issues in this forum, perhaps primarily because of the apparent increase in interest of Overseas Filipino Workers (OFW) in annulment, is the proper venue of &#8230; <a href="http://attyatwork.com/venue-for-petitions-for-annulment-or-declaration-of-nullity/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/venue-for-petitions-for-annulment-or-declaration-of-nullity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pardon for Erap? What say you?</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/pardon-for-erap-what-say-you/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/pardon-for-erap-what-say-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attyatwork.com/pardon-for-erap-what-say-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a controversy on the proposal to pardon former President Joseph Estrada. Those in favor of the grant of Presidential pardon argue that Erap has suffered enough, that he is already 70 years old and that, in any event, PGMA &#8230; <a href="http://attyatwork.com/pardon-for-erap-what-say-you/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/pardon-for-erap-what-say-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rule on DNA Evidence</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/rule-on-dna-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/rule-on-dna-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attyatwork.com/rule-on-dna-evidence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This month, the Supreme Court issued the Rule on DNA Evidence, through A.M. No. 06-11-5-SC, 2 October 2007. The full text of the Rule on DNA Evidence is at the Philippine e-Legal Forum. The use of DNA in cases gained &#8230; <a href="http://attyatwork.com/rule-on-dna-evidence/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/rule-on-dna-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Writ of Amparo: Supreme Court approves Rules</title>
		<link>http://attyatwork.com/write-of-amparo-supreme-court-approves-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://attyatwork.com/write-of-amparo-supreme-court-approves-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Atty. Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.attyatwork.com/write-of-amparo-supreme-court-approves-rules/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court already approved the Rule on the Writ of Amparo (A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC), which is a remedy available to any person whose right to life, liberty, and security has been violated or is threatened with violation by an &#8230; <a href="http://attyatwork.com/write-of-amparo-supreme-court-approves-rules/">Read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://attyatwork.com/write-of-amparo-supreme-court-approves-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

