Everybody knows about “5-6” and similar lending schemes. Everybody also knows that, ironically, those who are in financial trouble are forced to accept ridiculously high interest rates – which, in many (almost all?) instances, leads to more trouble (financial or otherwise).
Indeed, with the suspension of the Usury Law and the removal of interest ceiling, the parties are free to stipulate the interest rates to be imposed on monetary obligations. However, while the Supreme Court recognizes the right of the parties to enter into contracts, this rule is not absolute.
In a recent case, the SC again dealt with the validity of interest agreed by the parties, stating that:
Stipulated interest rates are illegal if they are unconscionable and the Court is allowed to temper interest rates when necessary. In exercising this vested power to determine what is iniquitous and unconscionable, the Court must consider the circumstances of each case. What may be iniquitous and unconscionable in one case, may be just in another.
In that case, the SC reduced the interest rate from 18% to 12% per annum, noting, among others, that the amount involved has ballooned to an outrageous amount four times the principal debt.
Indeed, there is no hard and fast rule to determne the reasonableness of interest rates. Stipulated interest rates of 21%, 23% and 24% per annum had been sustained in certain cases.
On the other hand, there are plenty of cases when the SC equitably reduced the stipulated interest rates; for instance, from 18% to 10% per annum. The SC also voided the stipulated interest of 5.5% per month (or 66% per annum), for being “excessive, iniquitous, unconscionable and exorbitant, hence, contrary to morals (”contra bonos mores”), if not against the law”. The same is true with cases involving 36% per annum, 6% per month (or 72% per annum), and 10% and 8% per month. In these instances, the SC imposed the legal interest of 12%.
Just to be clear, “legal interest” doesn’t mean that anything beyond 12% is “illegal”. It simply means that in a loan or forbearance of money, the interest due should be that stipulated in writing, and in the absence thereof, the rate shall be 12% per annum.
——————–
Sources: Trade & Investment Development Corporation of the Philippines vs. Roblett Industrial Construction Corporation (G.R. No. 139290, 9 May 2006); Development Bank of the Philippines vs. Court of Appeal; Garcia vs. Court of Appeals; Medel vs. Court of Appeals; Security Bank and Trust Company vs. RTC Makati; Spouses Solangon vs. Salazar; Cuaton vs. Salud; Ruiz vs. CA; Eastern Shipping vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 97412 July 12, 1994.
Related posts:
- Salient Points of the Amendments to Rules 41, 45, 58 and 65 of the Rules of Court
- Penalty for Failure to Indicate Mandatory Continuing Legal Education (MCLE) Compliance
- Google-searching the Supreme Court
- SC issues Guidelines for Imposition of Libel Penalties
- JURIS Project: Supreme Court promotes mediation and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms
- Cases on the National Identification (ID) System
- Rule on Mandatory Legal Aid Service issued by Supreme Court
by waynie
01 Jul 2008 at 18:19
this is a nice site specially me being a young entrepreneur
that needs the side of the law to move and make the business legal
by Arnel Dy
01 Feb 2009 at 22:00
“But” if unpaid interest is to be compounded monthly then a 5.5% monthly interest would compute to nearly 80% annual interest.
by Eileen
02 Feb 2009 at 18:05
My uncle borrowed money from a “loan shark” and used as collateral their house & lot. He’s been paying partially but the loan has ballooned already due to the exorbitant interest rates. I think he only borrowed P1m-P2m five years ago and has paid since then, P6-P7m but he’s still in debt because of the very high interest (i.e. 6%-7% month or 72%-84% per annum!). Nabaon na sila sa utang and they have sold most of their properties (lot, car, jewelries, another house & lot, etc) but they just can’t catch up with the loan balance because of the interest! How can they get out of this situation?! Napunta na lahat sa loan shark ang kabuhayan nila and there’s a risk now that they will also lose their house & lot because the loan is not yet fully paid.
by Joan
04 Jan 2010 at 14:24
That is also my problem… Sobrang laki ang interest.. yung 150k n a inutang nmin in just 18 months naging 500k plus na.
Paano po ba ang pwde nmin gawin… ang mali ko din po eh pumirma kmi sa contract… pero wla nman po nka lagay na 7% ang interest dun. Paalis na po kc ako nun papuntang abroad, kya kapit sa patalim na nag loan kmi sa isang private na tao na ginawa pa nmin colateral yung bahay at lupa nmin. 135k po ang nka lagay sa deed of sale pra sa bahay. D nman po ako pinalad na maging ayos ang trabaho sa ibang bansa, after 2 months na uwi po ako dahil d2 kmi pinag exit nang company na nangako na babalik din o kukunin kmi after 1 month, pero d na po kmi kinuha. Yung 7% na interest months isinama na nya sa principal nung gumawa cya nang contract… at sa 18 months po eh nka compound po ang interest at capital. kya po sobra cyang lumaki.
Ako po ang nang sanla sa pamamagitan nang special power of attorney nang mga kapatid ko na yung ibang perma eh ginawa ko nlang, hindi cla ang pumirma.
Nagigipag usap na po kmi sa pinag sanlaan nmin kung pwede na bawasan ang interest sa 300k, dhil yun lang po ang kya sa panibaging loan sa banko na, na mas maliit ang interest at mas mahabang bayaran.
Isa pa pong iniisip ko eh yung mga na release ko na cheke sa knila, dhil pinag open mo nya ako nang checking account at pina pirma nang mga amount na wlang date sa pangalan nila. 6 ba 7k pra sa 6 months na interest at isang 150k pra sa pirncipal.
Paano po kya ang gagawin ko?
by hyperboliccosecant
02 Feb 2010 at 11:42
Does this apply to fines for late rental payments?