Comments on: New writer at the Forum; Alex Magno is “Off-line” http://attyatwork.com/new-writer-at-the-forum-alex-magno-is-off-line/ Legal thoughts and beyond Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:53:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: AttyatWork http://attyatwork.com/new-writer-at-the-forum-alex-magno-is-off-line/comment-page-1/#comment-46 AttyatWork Wed, 01 Nov 2006 07:49:20 +0000 http://www.attyatwork.com/new-writer-at-the-forum-alex-magno-is-off-line/#comment-46 Very true, Erwin. I recall similar criticisms against Magno in past issues. Let me check....here it is, at <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.uniffors.com/?p=116" rel="nofollow">Uniffors. </a> Very true, Erwin. I recall similar criticisms against Magno in past issues. Let me check….here it is, at Uniffors.

Thumb up Thumb down 0

]]> By: the bystander http://attyatwork.com/new-writer-at-the-forum-alex-magno-is-off-line/comment-page-1/#comment-42 the bystander Wed, 01 Nov 2006 01:14:40 +0000 http://www.attyatwork.com/new-writer-at-the-forum-alex-magno-is-off-line/#comment-42 Had Magno been a lawyer, I would have accorded some "weight" to his "legal" opinion. But he is not. It is basically a rehash of Lambino's view that the SC is not a trier of facts. We know he understood what the main decision meant because it was written in clear unmistakable language. Except for the gullible, I don't think anyone believes him. Had Magno been a lawyer, I would have accorded some “weight” to his “legal” opinion. But he is not. It is basically a rehash of Lambino’s view that the SC is not a trier of facts. We know he understood what the main decision meant because it was written in clear unmistakable language.

Except for the gullible, I don’t think anyone believes him.

Thumb up Thumb down 0

]]>